Grade retention based on low FCAT reading scores is a failure
28 Sep 2006 As I See It By Robert R. Lange
contribute@osceolanewsgazette.com
A 2002 Florida law mandates that third-grade students with FCAT reading scores at level 1 or below be required to repeat grade three.
However, one- and two-year follow-up achievement data collected by the Florida Department of Education and reported by Greene and Winters of the Manhattan Institute For Policy Research show there was little improvement after retention.
. . .
Recently, those who control the Florida Legislature and Gov. Jeb Bush claimed that holding students back would allow slower learning students to catch up with their grade peers. As was predicted by those who have studied the long-term impact of such unfounded beliefs, fairy-tales don’t come true.
The findings in Florida closely agree with the many previous studies of the impact of grade-level retention.
. . .
Most experts have classified the percentile and effect-size comparisons found in the Florida data as trivial or very small – small enough to indicate a failed intervention.
Contrary to widely accepted standard interpretations of data, the report from the Manhattan Institute claimed that the results support the use of grade retention for improving student achievement.
Wise readers will note that the Manhattan Institute’s stated goal is to support the conservative political agenda and to influence public policy in a direction desired by big business and the wealthy. At the same time, this writer has a long reputation as a supporter of liberal child-centered strategies for improving student achievement.
Research data are always meaningless until interpreted. Researchers with different agendas can always see divergent meanings when reviewing data.
. . .
Sure, FCAT test scores have shown some improvement. But measurement experts have noted that average scores on standardized tests such as the FCAT most always increase over time. The gradual increase reflects natural test corruption as teachers become more familiar with non-changing test items and test formats.
In Florida, the higher scores were likely caused by such natural test corruption and by Florida Department of Education tweaking of the test scoring process. Such tweaking was suggested in comments made by Education Commissioner John L. Winn.
Gov. Bush’s A+ plan seems to be designed to ensure that the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Perhaps, the plan was put together by persons who enjoy kicking those who are down or have fallen behind.
Robert R. Lange is a retired professor of educational research who taught at the University of Central Florida for 25 years and was the former associate dean for research at Colorado State University. Contact him at lange@mail.ucf.edu.