Sunday, May 24, 2009

The FCAT: Florida's Pink Elephant

Standardized testing results were reported this week for Florida’s third graders and a pink elephant still roams the Sunshine State.

In every community the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) was given to African-American, Latino and white children living in poverty, scores were low. Just about all of the 34,873 lowest scores, those children who now may wear the Scarlet Letter, came out of economically depressed neighborhoods. Higher FCAT scores without exception came from communities where African-American, Latino and white children live in relative affluence, material comfort and physical safety.

So now the dance around Florida’s pink elephant begins.

The governor, the legislators, and school board members across the state will dance for campaign contributors who fund their runs for office. Their corporate backers generated this whole standardized testing movement in the first place. Their preference is for a private for-profit school system and the FCAT provides a steady stream of headlines that scream of failing public schools.

The political appointees on the Florida Board of Education and the bureaucrats in the Florida Department of Education and the office of Commissioner Eric Smith will dance to advance their influence and career goals. Their job is to manufacture every rationalization no matter how farfetched, find every stitch of evidence no matter how irrelevant, and offer up every diversion no matter how harebrained to hide the pink elephant. But the pink elephant will still be there. There is a perfect correlation of FCAT scores to the economic circumstances of the test taker.

The FCAT is different things to different people.

For a devious and ambitious politician the FCAT can be the gateway to higher office. In 2006 Jeb Bush handed his job over to Charlie Crist and began appearing with New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg. The two prospective 2008 presidential candidates wanted to talk to the nation about our schools. Bush advertised himself as the “education governor” based on skyrocketing FCAT scores in Florida. As they reported this year’s results The Miami Herald recalled that, “In 2006, thousands of third-grade reading scores were inflated because the test was too easy … an error discovered in 2007. The state later hired a consultant to oversee the testing program and all future tests.”

For the 8 or 9-year-old child the FCAT is a trial by fire. Children have vomited on their test booklets. Children have wet themselves during the test. All the tested children are anxious. It is not a health anxiety. It is not like butterflies before you play the big game or run the big race. For some of these young children there is a sense of dread. The FCAT is a monster under the bed.

If only the FCAT were an imaginary ogre that could be dispatched with a hug and some soothing reassurance from a loved one. But this threat is not in their minds. It is real. Every child knows one thing going into that third grade FCAT testing room. They know there is strict punishment for poor performance. They know the punishment is not over quickly. They know it will last a long time.

The State of Florida essentially embarked on a groundbreaking educational experiment through the FCAT. The Miami Herald describes it thus, “Third-graders have to score a two or higher in reading to move on to fourth grade. Research shows students need to master reading by third grade to learn from textbooks and not fall behind in class, which could eventually lead to dropping out of school.” Poverty, racism, neglect, abuse, malnutrition, the constant threat of violence—there will be no excuses for the inability to master FCAT reading skills. The state is determined to test the nurturing properties of shame and public humiliation on poor children.

34,873.

Tonight there are 34,873 little souls in Florida that tremble at what may come tomorrow.

Paul A. Moore
Miami Carol City High
Miami, Florida

Monday, April 06, 2009

Rigor?

Marion Brady (retired educator, author, columnist) is one of the best thinkers in America on the subject of education. He's also one of the most consistently ignored, at least among the movers and shakers who make education policy.

In this slide show, which Brady calls "A reaction to Corporate America's big "RIGOR!" push," he takes his essential message and puts it into terms so simple that even corporate CEOs and politicians can understand it. Of course, it's not the message they want to hear, so it'll likely still fall on deaf ears (including those of Barack Obama and Arne Duncan).

Saturday, March 28, 2009

Failing School or Failed Accountabilty System?

Something is terribly wrong at Miami's Maya Angelou Elementary School!

According to the Florida Department of Education, Maya Angelou became a failing school last year. Strange since the year before it was a model school, an "A" school, judged by the same Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT). But test scores don't lie so Maya Angelou was placed, along with neighboring inner-city schools like Holmes Elementary and Liberty City Elementary, on the state's list of schools subject to Differentiated Accountability (DA). DA is a fancy way of threatening that Maya Angelou will be closed if the kids there don't become better test takers.

One can only imagine the goings on in one of these failing schools. That may have inspired the Miami Herald to send its education reporter Kathleen McGrory into Maya Angelou for a look see. And McGrory found Ms. Cointa Martin's second grade class ignoring FCAT test prep and living in the real world. It's the world where Macy's lays off 600 of its Miami office employees and the children dare to care.

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/5min/story/971891.html

McCrory's story is accompanied by pictures of Kayla Yorks, a 7-year-old, and Daniel Hernandez, 7 too. Daniel wrote about unemployment, "It isn't easy when you lose your job. You have to buy things for your family, but you don't have enough money." Daniel's classmate and budding philosopher, 8-year-old Charlene Montero, added, "Deserts may seem empty at first, but if you know where to look, you will find they are full of life." The story ultimately introduces us to a cross section of Ms. Martin's class and of the community. There's Kayla, Daniel, Charlene, and Cierra Rodgers, Jackeline Ramirez, Javier Nunez, and Michael Hollomon.

Incredibly, the kids from the failing Maya Angelou Elementary seemed to reach accomplished adult professionals with their concern. Their "little tiny inspirational posters" brought tears to the eyes of broadcast manager Margaret Torok. Retouching specialist Nelson Viera said, "It reminded me that there's so much hope out there---we just have to open our eyes and see it. Truthfully, it made me feel so much better." The Macy's employees responded with letters and a book created by Viera. Veteran teacher Martin wrapped up the lesson for her kids, "When you are kind to someone, they will be kind to you."

Next year, as third graders, Ms. Martin's charges will face the FCAT. The test awards no points for kindness. Florida is in the middle of a groundbreaking experiment with childhood accountability and the educational value of humiliation If the 9-year-olds do not meet the reading standards of the FCAT they will be severely punished. The educational policy of the state, executed by Governor Charlie Crist and the Commissioner of Education Eric Smith, is to brand such children as failed. That is kept in confidence but then to make sure the lesson on accountability is seared into a child's brain and self-image forever, they are publicly humiliated. During the next school year their classmates proceed to grade four while they join a new group of kids to repeat third grade.

The FDOE does not report this but the vastly disproportionate number of the children retained in the third grade come from schools like Maya Angelou Elementary. They are children living in poverty. They are children of color. They are Ms. Martin's children.

Paul A. Moore

Miami Carol City High School


Friday, June 29, 2007

What Else Is New?



And the "school grades" are due out soon. And your property taxes will be cut. And the factory-style schooling continues.

And more kids are lost in the shuffle.


"Educators are trying to create a form to fit every child, and you just can't do that," said Stephen Rushton, a professor and researcher at the University of South Florida. "We have lost the whole child in this testing craze."

Friday, June 22, 2007

Teacher a victim of a failed system

I was savoring every line of this terrific letter in today's St. Pete Times so much that I didn't even glance at the writer's name until I got
to the bottom, when I saw that it's by one of my personal heroines--FCAR director Judy Castillo. For those new to FCAR, in 2003 Judy and her husband sued the state for access to their son's graded FCATs. They didn't prevail, thanks to one of Jeb's appointees (and former staffers) on the appeals court, who reversed a favorable lower court decision, but they brought a lot of sunshine into a very dark corner--and won my undying respect. ~Gloria Pipkin



Teacher a victim of a failed system

The teacher in Pasco County who was fired for FCAT violations is a scapegoat for a failed system. At one time, citizens may have believed the FCAT would improve education. But now, most of us understand that the FCAT is just another divisive tool being used to segregate students. Wealthier communities enjoy higher scores and receive more state funds. Poorer communities suffer lower scores and, therefore, receive less funding. This is institutional racism cloaked in its finest apparel.

I am a high school teacher. During FCAT season, we must attend a brief tutorial on how to administer the test. We receive a book of instruction that none of us is able to completely read. Then, we are forced to sign a paper that stipulates we will not look at the FCAT booklet.

However, we are told that we must proctor the test by moving about the room, making sure all students are on the correct section of the test. How do you do that without glancing at the test? So, teachers are forced into a corner. We are the ones who must pay for the state's unprofessionalism. The state made big mistakes on last year's tests, yet who among them must lose their jobs? Who among them must be responsible to the taxpayers for the cost of a bungled debacle? Who among them will even apologize to the citizens of this state who believed in them? To the schools who depend on them? To the teachers who are sacrificed by them?

Because the state has done such a remarkable job of clouding the real issues in education, including the FCAT sham, it is hard for most people to see what's really at the core of this program. FCAT is not about improving education. It is not about fairness, equality or progress. It is about money and political manipulation. Sacrificing a teacher here or there to maintain rigid control and fear among educators is a small price for them to pay.

I hope the new governor is willing to undress the FCAT and promote a truly progressive education plan - one based on openness, clarity and honesty, and one that doesn't hold teachers hostage in the classrooms, afraid to make the wrong move, afraid to help students, afraid to do their jobs. Let's hope the new governor values what education is about: asking questions and finding answers.

Judy Castillo, Florida Coalition for Assessment Reform, Brooksville

Thursday, May 31, 2007

Commissioner Blomberg responds to our letter

Below is the announcement from FCAR president Gloria Pipkin regarding Commissioner Blomberg's response to our open letter.
_________________________________________________

I'm pleased to announce that FCAR will have a representative on the external advisory group that will assist the Department of Education in identifying an independent, external group of testing experts to review the data from 2006 and recommend a procedure for establishing an annual review of the test.

I had a call from the Commissioner's office this morning, letting us know that the advisory group meets in Orlando tomorrow and inviting us to appoint a representative. Dr. Robert Lange, retired UCF professor of educational measurement and FCAR stalwart, will represent FCAR.

Gloria

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

Open Letter To Gov. Crist, Comm. Blomberg

Florida Coalition for Assessment Reform, Inc.

for further information:
Gloria Pipkin: 850 265-6438
cell: 850 866-9537
or Bob Schaeffer: 239 395-6773

for immediate release, Tuesday, May 28, 2007

ASSESSMENT REFORMERS SEEK "STRICT ACCOUNTABILITY" FOR FCAT; OPEN LETTER TO GOV. CRIST, COMM. BLOMBERG CALLS FOR COMPREHENSIVE, PUBLIC REVIEW OF STATE TESTS IN WAKE OF SCORING ERROR

The Florida Coalition for Assessment Reform (FCAR) today delivered to Florida Governor Charlie Crist and Education Commissioner Jeanine Blomberg a set of recommendations to implement "the administration's pledge of openness and transparency in reviewing the FCAT in the wake of the recent disclosure of the 2006 Grade Three scoring error."

Commissioner Blomberg has indicated that a review will take place but has not provided details about who will conduct the investigation, what topics it will cover, when it will be completed, or whether the results will be made public.

In an open letter, FCAR said, "The powerful impact of the FCAT on our children, our schools, and our communities demands strict accountability to the public" and listed suggestions including:

  • hearings around the state to determine the scope of questions Floridians want addressed;

  • inclusion of representatives from groups such as FCAR and the Florida League of Women Voters in the FCAT review process;

  • input from independent measurement experts as well as teachers, parents and school counselors;

  • investigation of all recent FCAT scores, not just the 2006 exam where the state admits an error was made; and

  • publication of relevant documents about how the FCAT is designed, constructed and administered, including the exam's technical manual

FCAR is a non-profit, non-partisan, statewide organization with members in 50 of Florida's school districts.

- - - - -
The text of the FCAR letter to Gov. Crist and Commissioner Blomberg follows
- - - - -

FLORIDA COALITION FOR ASSESSMENT REFORM, INC

May 28, 2007

Dear Governor Crist and Commissioner Blomberg:

The Florida Coalition for Assessment Reform (FCAR) applauds the administration's pledge of openness and transparency in reviewing the FCAT in the wake of the recent disclosure of the 2006 Grade Three scoring error. The powerful impact of the FCAT on our children, our schools, and our communities demands strict accountability to the public.

In that spirit, we ask you to consider these comments and suggestions:

  • The review process should begin with public hearings around the state, at convenient times and places, to help determine the scope of questions Florida parents, educators, and taxpayers want addressed.

  • The audit team should include representatives from FCAR, as well as representatives of the Florida League of Women Voters, which has recently launched a study of the FCAT, and other concerned organizations throughout the state

  • The team should seek input from teachers, parents, school counselors, and other child advocates, along with independent psychometricians.

  • The investigation should go beyond the 2006 test, thoroughly examining the validity, reliability, and fairness of the FCAT and its uses.

  • As part of upholding a pledge of openness and transparency, all critical documents about the FCAT (such as the technical manual) should be made available online and in libraries so that everyone concerned can understand how the test is designed, administered, and graded.

FCAR is a nonprofit organization with members and contacts in more than fifty school districts. We are committed to open, broad-based, constructive assessment that reflects the complexity of learning and respects the diversity of learners.

We look forward to hearing from you as you convene an external advisory group this week, at which time we will be pleased to submit the names of testing experts to review the data from 2006 and recommend a procedure for establishing an annual review of the test.

Sincerely,

Gloria Pipkin, President
for the FCAR Board of Directors

850 265-6438
fcar@fcarweb.org -- www fcarweb.org

Vital Questions

In light of the recent revelations about last year's third grade FCAT scores [see our post from May 27], the questions asked by FCAR vice president Marion Brady are more urgent than ever.

I'm (Mr.) Marion Brady, long-time Florida teacher, administrator, publisher consultant, teacher educator, policy analyst, author of texts and professional books, myriad journal articles, and six years of newspaper columns distributed by KRT. I'm under no contract to anyone, and am offering non-exclusive rights to the following because I think the issues are too important to ignore. I live in Cocoa, and my phone number is 321-636-3448.

___________________

Jim Warford, executive director of the Florida Association of School Administrators, made an important point in his recent column in many of Florida's newspapers. The real FCAT issue isn't about accountability. All educators believe in it. Always have. Always will. It isn't being held accountable that frustrates them, but the FCAT's superficial, simplistic approach to it.

A source of even greater frustration for many is the degree to which the standardized testing fad has shut down dialog on education-related questions of great importance, questions bearing on student performance and societal well-being.

Here are some of those questions:

  • The present thrust of education "reform" assumes the familiar curriculum, now locked in place by "standards and accountability," is as appropriate today as it was when it was adopted in 1892. Is it?

  • If there are problems with the traditional, same-thing-for-everybody curriculum, don't "raising the bar" and "rigor" make the problems worse?

  • Management experts say poor institutional performance almost always indicates unaddressed "system" problems. Poor FCAT scores aren't being blamed on the system but on the people in the system. Are the experts wrong?

  • The FCAT is part of a reform movement that assumes market forces can shape schools up. At least one Florida legislator is even considering introducing legislation to pay students for passing scores. Does this mean that learning is unnatural and won't happen unless teachers and kids are threatened or bribed?

  • The FCAT is rapidly pushing "frills" out of the curriculum. Has research now established that art, music, physical activity and so on have nothing to do with developing reasoning ability and other desirable educational outcomes?

  • On critical, instruction-related questions, local educators and school boards are increasingly being pushed out of the decision-making loop. Does the history of top-down, centralized control suggest this change strategy works?

  • Statewide, thousands of kids are being held back because of poor reading and math scores. Is the ability to interpret symbols and fill in ovals on multiple-choice tests the only way kids learn, and therefore sufficient reason to flunk them?

  • Education is supposed to teach kids to think for themselves, not just recall what they've been ordered to remember. Are corporately produced, machine-scored tests able to judge the relative quality of complex thought processes? If so, why aren't they already doing that?

  • Will manipulating the curriculum to "maintain America's competitive position in world trade" be more likely to ensure America's future well-being than helping kids love learning because it lets them pursue their abilities wherever they lead?

  • Frantic to avoid the test-triggered "failing" label, educators use myriad strategies to "game" the system. For example, administrators, knowing ahead of time which kids will and which likely won't pass the FCAT, ignore them and flood the "marginals" with attention. Is it possible to track and counter all such score-distorting strategies?

  • If, as Acting Commissioner of Education Jeanine Blomberg says, state officials "...will go back and re-equate and rescale the 2006 third-grade FCAT reading exam..." isn't this an admission of how open the scoring process is to political manipulation?

  • The FCAT's defenders insist that it's legitimate because it's tied to the Sunshine State Standards. No one is questioning the quality of those
    "standards"- their lack of an overarching aim, their failure to capitalize on the mutually supportive nature of school subjects, or their emphasis on knowledge rather than on what kids can actually do with what they know. Aren't those problems sufficiently serious to warrant a fresh look at the Standards?

Back in the 1980s, before the leaders of business and industry and the politicians hi-jacked education reform, thoughtful educators were beginning to explore ways to move student intellectual performance to a whole new level. The keys were World War II-developed General Systems Theory and research into how the brain organizes information. The FCAT's "mother" - the No Child Left Behind legislation - stopped that effort dead in its tracks.

The new model for education reform is the 19th century classroom of Charles Dickens' "Mr. Gradgrind." Future generations will look back on this era and shake their heads in disbelief at the naivete of the amateurs now writing education policy.